If cleanliness is next to godliness, traceability is next to transparency - a virtue very much in demand in today's Food and Beverage industry. There is more to this rising trend than simply an increasingly informed body of consumers looking to make woke product choices.
The International Organization for Standardization defines traceability as:
“The ability to follow the movement of a feed or food through specified stage(s) of production, processing and distribution” (ISO 22005/2007)
The standard also explains the principles and requirements for the design and implementation of feed and food traceability systems. The Codex Alimentarius Commission uses similar wording (CAC/GL 60-2006) and sets out “principles for traceability/product tracing as a tool within a food inspection and certification system”.
A closer look at traceability, also known as the “one-step-back-one-step-forward principle”, reveals two major distinctions:
For starters, companies are subject to various traceability regulations. In the US, for instance, the Food and Drug Administration’s Food Safety Modernization Act has notched the prevention of contamination events up the corporate agenda. In the European Union, the General Food Law Regulation requires companies to be able to trace and track food, feed and ingredients through all stages of production, processing and distribution. Businesses may also feel intrinsically motivated to comply with non-mandatory private standards, such as the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI), the Safe Quality Food (SQF) Program, the British Retail Consortium (BRC) Global Standard or the International Food Standard (IFS), or strive for EFSIS certification.
Why should food and beverage providers pursue product traceability of their own accord? Traceability is an indicator of enforced quality standards at corporate level, which is conducive to customer confidence and therefore good for business. It can help customers more readily identify potential sources of cross-contamination during manufacturing processes, thus avoiding any inadvertent allergic reactions. It also serves to appease any concerns surrounding potential food safety issues, especially against the backdrop of headline-worthy outbreaks of E. coli, avian flu or foot and mouth disease. The words salmonella, norovirus and listeria are enough to make your stomach turn without further comment. This is even before entering into horsemeat masquerading as beef territory, for example.
As well as boosting brand value and facilitating cultural compliance by providing sufficient information on whether or not a product fulfils Kosher or Halal criteria, say, product traceability can have tangible benefits in terms of business operations and revenues. In regard to the former, a solid traceability system facilitates smooth inventory, logistics and distribution processes and can help reduce response times in the event of product recalls, minimizing trade disruption. As for the latter, traceability can provide proof of purity or authenticity, justifying a higher retail price. This is complemented by hindering fraud or adulteration attempts by others, thereby putting competition in its place.
Traceability, particularly in the F&B industry, requires the maintenance of vast quantities of data of different types, which may include: batch codes, unit volumes, geographic origins, supplier information, customer contact details, operators on duty, delivery dates, write-offs and waste, order status details, stock levels, hallmarks of quality, taste profiles, animal and plant health. Moreover, this information must be structured in such a way that reflects the above-mentioned links and be called upon whenever required.
A daunting task made a little easier by the International Trade Centre's extensive information and four-step methodology for implementation. Tools to facilitate traceability include bar codes, radio frequency identification devices (RFIDs) and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). More sophisticated digital solutions are also being called upon to tackle this big data challenge. As predicted by Hospitality Insights, blockchain is chief among these.
Meanwhile, teething issues with blockchain’s scalability and cost have led some F&B manufacturers to develop their own in-house systems. Diary giant Fonterra uses an SAP Global Batch Trace system and has opted to provide consumers with real-time information using QR codes. Rockwell Automation offers a traceability platform called FactoryTalk® CPGSuite that traces products through the production life cycle, while ProfilePrint uses a metabolomic food sensor to trace tea and other dried plant-based foods back to their origins by capturing molecular data and matching it against a cloud-based database.
As you can imagine, there are a whole host of challenges involved in successfully guaranteeing traceability in the F&Bindustry. Skills gaps impeding rapid adoption, high upfront costs and cybersecurity risks are all legitimate barriers to implementation. However, considering your local legal framework, an improved ability to take targeted action if it becomes necessary and that extra polish to your company’s reputation, you may find it’s well worth aiming for it.